Output list
Book chapter
LSTM Autoencoder-Based Deep Neural Networks for Barley Genotype-to-Phenotype Prediction
Published 2025
AI 2024: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 342 - 353
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a key driver of precision agriculture, facilitating enhanced crop productivity, optimized resource management, and sustainable farming practices. Also, the expansion of genome sequencing technology has greatly increased crop genomic resources, offering deeper insights into genetic variation and enhancing desirable crop traits for better performance across various environments. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms are gaining traction for genotype-to-phenotype prediction, due to their excellence in capturing complex interactions within large, high-dimensional datasets. In this work, we present a new LSTM autoencoder-based model for barley genotype-to-phenotype prediction, specifically targeting flowering time and grain yield estimation. Our model outperformed the other baseline methods, highlighting its effectiveness in handling complex, high-dimensional agricultural datasets and enhancing the accuracy of crop phenotype prediction predictions. This approach has the potential to optimize crop yields and improve management practices.
Book chapter
A Riemannian Approach for Spatiotemporal Analysis and Generation of 4D Tree-Shaped Structures
Published 2024
Computer Vision – ECCV 2024: 18th European Conference, Milan, Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part LXVII, 326 - 341
We propose the first comprehensive approach for modeling and analyzing the spatiotemporal shape variability in tree-like 4D objects, i.e., 3D objects whose shapes bend, stretch and change in their branching structure over time as they deform, grow, and interact with their environment. Our key contribution is the representation of tree-like 3D shapes using Square Root Velocity Function Trees (SRVFT) [21]. By solving the spatial registration in the SRVFT space, which is equipped with an L2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{wasysym}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsbsy}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{upgreek}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}
\begin{document}$$\mathbb {L}^2$$\end{document} metric, 4D tree-shaped structures become time-parameterized trajectories in this space. This reduces the problem of modeling and analyzing 4D tree-like shapes to that of modeling and analyzing elastic trajectories in the SRVFT space, where elasticity refers to time warping. In this paper, we propose a novel mathematical representation of the shape space of such trajectories, a Riemannian metric on that space, and computational tools for fast and accurate spatiotemporal registration and geodesics computation between 4D tree-shaped structures. Leveraging these building blocks, we develop a full framework for modelling the spatiotemporal variability using statistical models and generating novel 4D tree-like structures from a set of exemplars. We demonstrate and validate the proposed framework using real 4D plant data.
Book chapter
Published 2015
Advanced Intelligent Computing Theories and Applications, 9227, 738 - 744
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder and characterized by recurrent seizures. Although many classification methods have been applied to classify EEG signals for detection of epilepsy, little attention is paid on accurate epileptic seizure detection methods with comprehensible and transparent interpretation. This study develops a detection framework and focuses on doing a comparative study by applying the four rule-based classifiers, i.e., the decision tree algorithm C4.5, the random forest algorithm (RF), the support vector machine (SVM) based decision tree algorithm (SVM + C4.5) and the SVM based RF algorithm (SVM + RF), to two-group and three-group classification and the most challenging five-group classification on epileptic seizures in EEG signals. The experimental results justify that in addition to high interpretability, RF has the competitive advantage for two-group and three-group classification with the average accuracy of 0.9896 and 0.9600. More importantly, its performance is highlighted in five-group classification with the highest average accuracy of 0.8260 in contrast to other three rule-based classifiers.