Output list
Book chapter
“Ecopreneurship, Corporate Citizenship and Sustainable Decision-Making”
Published 2010
Making ecopreneurs: developing sustainable entrepreneurship, 207 - 222
This analytical chapter argues that changes to organizational values and business practices, envisaged by environmental entrepreneurs, should also encompass reforming the process of organizational decision-making to construct more 'robust' decision outcomes that enhance corporate performance. Effective internal governance and decision-making requires the commitment and involvement of the internal stakeholders - the 'social efficiency' of organizational employees. What is then required is an enhanced decision-making methodology labelled 'Organization Decision Enhancement' (OOE). The result is a collaboratively-oriented decision making set of procedures.
Book chapter
Published 2005
Corporate Governance: Does Any Size Fit? (Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Volume 11), 303 - 328
Spectacular corporate failures including One Tel, Ansett, HIH, Enron and Worldcom and the recent fiasco with National Australia Bank are evidence of a legitimacy crisis in current corporate governance practices. This paper analyses the organisational impact of recent “best practice” guidelines and the recommendations for reform. We conclude that substantive concerns still exist and it is likely that companies will utilise a “tick the box” approach emphasising form over substance governance changes. We argue for a two-fold approach to embed effective ongoing reform. The first involves cultural change(s) at the boardroom level to develop a “real” team approach. This would embrace the use of constructive conflict in the decision-making process and also incorporate elements of trust and openness. Constructive conflict, we argue, leads to real and effective boardroom behavioural changes. The second strand of reform proposes that such changes should be extended into the internal decision-making (enterprise governance) arena. Such a move towards organisational pluralism devolves decision-making and allows greater employee involvement in the “running” of organisations. It also entails a significant re-framing of organisational values, culture and followership. The leadership role becomes one of facilitation and support not the current dominant “command and control” mindset.